When The Machine Turned on Democracy: Introducing The Digital Coup

‘All watched over by machines of loving grace’ - Richard Brautigan.

Today, we are beginning a new series on Plague Island. The Digital Coup will investigate how technology broke democracy in America and Britain; how the tools of Silicon Valley were systematically weaponised by anti-democratic actors to undermine elections, fracture reality, and bring us to the brink of democratic collapse.

For those who followed our previous investigation into The Dark Enlightenment, this series is the essential companion piece. The Dark Enlightenment explored the ideological and philosophical underpinnings of the new authoritarianism - the dark gospel of thinkers from Nick Land to Curtis Yarvin, the neoreactionary movement’s explicit rejection of democracy as a failed experiment. We traced the intellectual genealogy of a movement that believed the Enlightenment itself was a mistake, that hierarchy and autocracy were not bugs of human civilization, but features to be embraced.

But ideas, no matter how radical, remain impotent without a delivery system. The Digital Coup will investigate the technological and political machinery that brought those ideas to power. It will show how the abstract philosophy of the Dark Enlightenment became concrete political reality, how neoreactionary theories were put into practice by political campaigns, and how the digital tools of the 21st century became the vehicle for the oldest of human ambitions: power, control, and the destruction of democratic ideals.

Over the coming months, we will publish a series of in-depth articles that together form a comprehensive account of this hostile takeover of our information ecosystem. We will trace the story from the early, optimistic days of social media through the weaponisation of these platforms in 2016, to the reality crisis that followed, and finally to the terrifying new frontier of AI-driven political manipulation.

We begin on January 6th, 2021, because that day represents the physical manifestation of a digital disease. It marked the moment when years of algorithmic radicalisation broke out of the internet and into the heart of American democracy.

The Day the Internet Stormed the Capitol

When the mob stormed the U.S. Capitol on January 6th, 2021, the world watched a scene of political chaos that felt both shocking and strangely inevitable. It was a spectacle of violence, a physical assault on the citadel of American democracy. But to truly understand that day, you couldn’t just look at the flags, the faces, or the political grievances shouted into the cold January air. You had to look at the phones. You had to see the event for what it was: the physical manifestation of a digital disease, a fever that broke out of the internet’s dark corners and into the heart of American power.

The insurrection was not born in the streets of Washington D.C.; it was conceived in the algorithmic fever swamps of Facebook, incubated in the echo chambers of YouTube, and organised on the decentralised platforms of a new, fractured internet. The flags they carried bore the logos of online cults and digital armies - QAnon, Kekistan, the Three Percenters. The chants were memes brought to life, disconnected from any coherent political program. One man, wearing a fur headdress and face paint, became the iconic image of the day. He was not a revolutionary, but a performance artist whose costume had been workshopped on internet forums. Another insurrectionist paused mid-riot to pose for a selfie at Nancy Pelosi’s desk, grinning for the camera as if he were a tourist, not a participant in an attempted coup. The entire spectacle, from the breach of the barricades to the occupation of the Senate floor, was performed for a global audience through the selfie cameras of its participants.

It was a riot, but it was also content, meticulously documented and instantly uploaded to the very platforms that had fuelled the rage that got them there. It was a physical event designed for a digital audience, a feedback loop of outrage made real. The insurrectionists livestreamed their assault on democracy, narrating their actions for followers back home, turning sedition into a participatory spectacle. They were not just protesters who happened to have phones; they were digital natives executing a plan that had been developed, refined, roleplayed, and amplified through years of algorithmic radicalisation. They had been told, again and again by the algorithm, that this was what patriots do.

From Liberation to Manipulation

How did we get here? How did the digital public square, once hailed as a tool for liberation during the Arab Spring, become the primary engine of democratic collapse? The transformation was neither accidental nor inevitable in the way we might think. It was the system working as designed, but toward ends its creators never fully anticipated or, in some cases, wilfully ignored.

In 2011, when protesters filled Tahrir Square in Cairo, Western observers marvelled at the power of social media to organise dissent and topple dictators. Facebook and Twitter were celebrated as liberation technologies, tools that would democratise information and empower citizens against authoritarian regimes. The narrative was seductive: give people the ability to connect and communicate, and freedom would naturally follow. But what those early celebrations missed was that the same tools that could organise a protest could also be used to survey, manipulate, and control populations on an unprecedented scale.

Governments around the world watched the Arab Spring with alarm. Authoritarian regimes in Russia, China, and the Middle East began to study these platforms not as threats to be banned, but as weapons to be mastered. They realised that if social media could be used to organise dissent, it could also be used to sow division, spread disinformation, and undermine the very concept of truth itself. This was the authoritarian awakening. This was the moment when tyrants learned to turn the tools of liberation into instruments of control.

But the West was slow to recognise the threat, in part because Silicon Valley had built these platforms with a different kind of authoritarianism in mind: the authoritarianism of the market. The business model of surveillance capitalism demanded growth at all costs, and growth meant engagement. Engagement meant keeping users on the platform as long as possible, and the most reliable way to do that was through emotional arousal: outrage, fear, tribalism, conspiracy. The algorithm didn’t care about truth or democracy; it cared about clicks.

The Unholy Alliance

The central argument of this new series is this: the crisis of Western democracy is not just about populism, inequality, or political polarisation. It is fundamentally a crisis of technology. A specific set of digital tools, built for financial gain under the relentless logic of surveillance capitalism, was systematically weaponised by a new breed of anti-democratic actors. This series will trace the unholy alliance between the amoral, engagement-at-all-costs architecture of Silicon Valley and the authoritarian ambitions of tyrants, trolls, and chaos agents.

Subscribe to Notes From Plague Island and join our growing community of readers and thinkers.

This is the story of two villains. The first is ‘The Machine’: the vast, automated infrastructure of data extraction and behavioural prediction. It is the News Feed, the recommendation algorithm, the ad-targeting system; an architecture designed not to inform or connect, but to capture and hold human attention for the purpose of selling it to the highest bidder. Its fuel is our data; its product is our future behaviour. It is a system that, by its very nature, prioritises emotional arousal over reasoned debate, outrage over understanding, and conspiracy over truth, because those are the things that keep us scrolling.

The Machine was built by engineers who believed they were connecting the world, but what they actually built was a global-scale behaviour modification system. Every like, every share, every second of attention was tracked, analysed, and fed back into an algorithm designed to predict and influence what you would do next. The more the algorithm learned about you, the better it got at manipulating you. And because the business model depended on maximising engagement, the algorithm learned to show you content that would provoke the strongest emotional reaction, not the most truthful, not the most important, but the most enraging.

Consider a simple example: two users, neighbours in the same town, scroll through their Facebook feeds on the same morning. One sees a video of a local protest, framed as ‘concerned citizens standing up for their community.’ The other sees the same protest, but the algorithm has selected a different video, one that frames it as ‘violent radicals threatening our way of life.’ Both users believe they are seeing reality. Both are being shown a version of reality optimised not for truth, but for engagement. The algorithm has learned that the first user clicks on content that affirms community solidarity, while the second user clicks on content that stokes fear and outrage. Neither user knows they are living in different realities. This is not a bug. This is the business model.

The second villain are ‘The Masters’: the political actors who saw this machine not as a town square, but as a weapon. They are the state-sponsored strategists in Moscow who pioneered the doctrine of hybrid warfare, understanding that you could destabilise a democracy without firing a shot if you could control its information ecosystem. They are the nihilistic political consultants like Steve Bannon, who packaged military-grade psychological operations for political campaigns, promising to use data and algorithms to “build an unwinnable election.” They are the populist demagogues like Donald Trump, who discovered they could ride the algorithmic waves of outrage all the way to the highest offices in the land. And they are the ideologues like Aleksandr Dugin, whose vision of a post-liberal world order provided the intellectual justification for the assault on democracy.

These actors did not build the weapon, but they perfected its use. They understood that in a world where attention is the most valuable commodity, the person who can command attention commands power. And they understood that the easiest way to command attention in an algorithmic ecosystem is through provocation, transgression, and the systematic destruction of shared reality.

The Four-Part Investigation

The Digital Coup will tell the story of how The Masters seized control of The Machine. Our investigation will unfold in four parts, providing a comprehensive history of this hostile takeover.

Part I: The Architecture of Control (2004–2015) will uncover how the infrastructure for political manipulation was built. We begin with the creation of Facebook’s News Feed in 2006, the moment when the social internet stopped being a place you visited and became a stream that followed you everywhere. We will examine how the smartphone revolution put that stream in every pocket, creating a 24/7 connection to the algorithmic feed. We will dissect the business model that made it all possible: the venture capital-fuelled “gospel of growth” that forced companies to prioritise engagement above all else, leading to the optimisation of platforms for emotional arousal rather than informed discourse. And we will reveal the shadowy data-broker ecosystem that grew up around these platforms, harvesting and selling detailed psychological profiles on billions of citizens.

Part II: The Weaponization of the System (2016) will focus on the year the machine was turned on democracy. We begin with Cambridge Analytica, the data firm that promised to use psychographic profiling to micro target voters with unprecedented precision. But Cambridge Analytica was just the visible tip of a much larger iceberg. We will trace the company’s roots back to SCL Group, a military contractor that had spent decades running psychological operations for governments around the world. We will introduce the key political actors - Vladimir Putin, whose intelligence services pioneered the use of social media for hybrid warfare; Steve Bannon, who saw in these tools the opportunity to fuel a global nationalist insurgency; and Aleksandr Dugin, the Russian philosopher whose anti-liberal ideology provided the intellectual framework for the assault. We will investigate the dual tactics of the 2016 campaign: the GRU’s hacking and strategic leaking of Democratic emails, and the Internet Research Agency’s industrial-scale disinformation operation. And we will conduct case studies on Brexit and the election of Donald Trump, showing how Russian interference, data exploitation, and algorithmic manipulation combined to produce two of the most consequential political outcomes of the 21st century. This section will also examine Trump’s decades-long financial and political ties to Russia, revealing how he became the perfect asset for Putin’s anti-democratic agenda.

Part III: The Reality Crisis (2017–2022) will explore the devastating aftermath. With the old gatekeepers of media dead and the new platforms fully optimised for outrage, we entered an era where shared reality itself collapsed. We will trace the rise of QAnon from the fringe of 4chan to the floor of Congress, showing how the algorithmic amplification of conspiracy theories created a parallel information ecosystem where millions of Americans came to believe that a cabal of Satan-worshipping paedophiles controlled the government. We will conduct an analysis of the “Stop the Steal” movement, revealing how it was not a grassroots phenomenon but a carefully coordinated, multi-platform campaign to delegitimise the 2020 election. And we will follow the digital-to-physical pipeline that led directly from Facebook groups and YouTube channels to the steps of the Capitol on January 6th, showing how online radicalisation became offline insurrection.

Part IV: The New Frontier (2023–2025) will look at the present and the terrifying future. Just as we begin to grapple with the damage of social media, a new and more powerful weapon has arrived: generative AI. We will analyse the next generation of threats, from photorealistic deepfakes that can create counterfeit evidence in an instant, to the emergence of partisan AI models trained to produce ideologically skewed realities. We will explore a future where every citizen can have their own personalised propagandist in their pocket, an AI assistant that confirms every bias and dismisses every inconvenient fact. But we will also document the nascent resistance - the whistleblowers like Frances Haugen who exposed the inner workings of The Machine, the regulators in the European Union pushing back with landmark legislation like the Digital Services Act, and the tech workers themselves who are beginning to question the ethics of the systems they are building.

The Invitation

For those who followed our journey into the Dark Enlightenment, this new investigation is the essential next step. This series is not just for those who followed the first series, though. It is for anyone who has watched in horror as democracy has been destabilised, as truth has been weaponised, as reality itself has fractured into a thousand algorithmic shards. It is for anyone who has felt the vertigo of living in a world where facts no longer seem to matter, where conspiracy theories command more attention than journalism, where a lie can travel around the world before the truth has time to load.

The story of the digital coup is the story of our time. It is the story of how the most powerful communication technologies ever created were turned against the very idea of democratic self-governance. It is the story of how a small number of engineers, entrepreneurs, and political operatives reshaped the information ecosystem in ways that have brought us to the brink of democratic collapse.

It is also a story of resistance. Of whistleblowers who risked everything to expose the truth. Of regulators who fought back against the power of Big Tech. Of journalists who refused to accept the new normal. Of citizens who recognised the threat and began to organise.

Understanding this story is the first step toward fighting back. Join us on this investigation. The first official chapter, ‘Chapter 1: From Tahrir Square to Times Square: When the Machine Turned Against Democracy’

Or support us with a one-off tip → Buy Me a Coffee.