We Are Not Meant to Care: Reclaiming Empathy Through Action
The violence in Gaza continues. Children are still being killed, hospitals are still being bombed, families are still being buried under rubble. But the headlines have begun to fade. The social media posts slow to a whisper, the protests dwindle, the news cycle moves toward other stories, other crises, other spectacles. The violence has not stopped, but collective attention has wandered elsewhere.
This pattern repeats with mechanical precision: the return to what gets called "normal" while systematic violence continues. This isn't merely about modern attention spans, though they play their part. This reveals something fundamental about how societies function—the capacity to live in comfort while systematic violence unfolds, the ability to look away from ongoing atrocities, the talent for normalizing the unthinkable until it becomes invisible.
Gaza has not ended—it has been disappeared by the same machinery of distraction that keeps most people from seeing the brutality woven into the global economy. The same forces that can make societies forget ongoing violence can make them forget the 138 million children whose small hands weave clothes and harvest food, whose childhood is traded for convenience (UNICEF, 2025).
What gets called "normal" is built on exploitation. It includes sweatshops where human beings toil for twelve, fifteen hours, earning less in a day than many spend on coffee, their suffering hidden behind the facades of trusted brands. It includes environmental destruction so vast that wildlife populations have crashed by sixty-nine percent in fifty years, climate damages reaching two trillion dollars as the planet burns and floods (The Guardian, 2025).
This is the "normal" that societies embrace when cameras stop rolling and attention drifts. This is the foundation upon which modern comfort rests—systematic violence that powers contemporary ways of being. And perhaps most revealing, this is the reality that entire populations have been trained not to see, even when it stares back from every choice made daily.
The question that emerges is not how such a system came to be. The question is how modern societies have become so skilled at functioning within it while maintaining collective senses of moral decency, so adept at participating in horror while believing themselves innocent. How do entire populations manage to return to "normal" knowing what they know?
The answer lies not in ignorance—information is abundant—but in sophisticated mechanisms for looking away, for not seeing, for not connecting daily choices to their human cost. Entire civilizations have been built around the art of not knowing, not seeing, not feeling the weight of what has been wrought. Modern societies have become skilled at moral compartmentalization, at living with contradictions that would have troubled earlier generations.
This is an examination of truth—an attempt to see clearly what populations have been trained not to see, to understand that the violence witnessed in Gaza is not an aberration from the normal functioning of global capitalism, but a concentrated expression of its everyday brutality.
The Numbers Behind the Silence
The statistics tell a clear story about the world that has been constructed. In June of this year, the International Labour Organization and UNICEF released numbers that should have stopped the world in its tracks. Nearly 138 million children—more than the population of Russia—were engaged in child labor in 2024, including 54 million trapped in hazardous work (UNICEF, 2025).
These are 138 million children whose hands should be holding toys or pencils, instead wrapped around tools too heavy for their bones, stained with chemicals, cut by machinery. Their lungs fill with cotton dust so others might have cheap t-shirts, their fingers bleed over cocoa beans so others might taste sweetness, their backs bend in mines so others might carry the world in their pockets.
Sub-Saharan Africa bears the heaviest burden, carrying nearly two-thirds of all child laborers—87 million young lives. While the world celebrated marginal improvements, the report revealed a mathematical impossibility: to eliminate child labor within five years, progress would need to accelerate eleven times over. The number itself reveals that the system is not designed to eliminate child labor but to manage it, to keep it at levels that don't disrupt the flow of cheap goods.
Agriculture claims 61 percent of these young lives, followed by services at 27 percent—children selling goods in markets, cleaning houses, carrying water—and industry at 13 percent, where they mine and manufacture the materials of modern life. These percentages map exploitation that spans continents and connects cotton fields in Uzbekistan to clothing racks in Manhattan, cocoa farms in Ghana to chocolate aisles in London.
Nasreen Sheikh survived what these numbers represent. She worked twelve to fifteen hours each day in a textile sweatshop, earning less than two dollars for shifts that would break adults, completing hundreds of garments while eating, sleeping, and toiling in a space no larger than a prison cell. When she escaped and came to America, her first visit to a chain store became a revelation. "I walked the aisles in disbelief," she recalls, "looking at the thousands of products available to purchase in one location. When I gazed upon the countless consumer goods as I walked from aisle to aisle, I couldn't help but see the faces of children in each of them, of men's and women's lives marred by poverty, inhumane working conditions, and unimaginable exploitation. The suffering woven into each fiber and reflecting on every surface" (Walk Free, 2025).
The suffering woven into each fiber. Every thread in every shirt, every stitch in every shoe, every seam in every jacket—made with suffering, sewn with exploitation.
The environmental cost reads like a disaster report. Extreme weather damages have reached two trillion dollars in the decade leading to 2023, with 400 billion dollars lost in 2024 alone—numbers that translate into homes destroyed, lives shattered, futures erased (The Guardian, 2025). Wildlife populations have crashed by 69 percent over the past fifty years, a collapse that scientists describe as a direct result of capitalism's relentless hunger for growth and profit extraction.
The climate crisis has become so severe that major insurers warn it could destroy capitalism entirely—not through moral awakening, but through the simple arithmetic of uninsurable risk. The system that created the crisis may be consumed by its own creation.
These numbers represent more than statistics; they are the accounting ledger of a system that has calculated the acceptable level of human suffering required to maintain profit margins. They represent boardroom decisions that weigh the cost of compliance against the cost of exploitation and choose exploitation. They represent a global economy that has institutionalized violence so thoroughly that progress gets measured not by its elimination, but by marginal improvements in its efficiency.
The clothing industry alone has doubled in size over fifteen years, driven by hunger for fast fashion, for constant novelty. From raw materials to manufacturing, from packaging to delivery, modern slavery is embedded in every stage. The 50 million people living in modern slavery around the world are not victims of pre-modern barbarism; they are the foundation stones upon which the modern economy stands, their exploitation not a bug in the system but its most essential feature (Walk Free, 2025).
What makes these numbers particularly revealing is not just their scale, but their invisibility. The same global supply chains that enable this exploitation are deliberately designed to obscure it, to create layers of subcontractors and suppliers that function like mirrors, reflecting responsibility away from those who profit most. Companies create these structures specifically to maintain "plausible deniability"—the ability to claim ignorance of conditions they have every incentive not to investigate.
As Nasreen Sheikh observes, "The sad fact for most businesses is that if they look hard enough for worker exploitation—or if they even look at all—they will find it." The looking away is not accidental; it is structural, profitable, essential to the system's continued functioning.
This is the arithmetic of modern comfort: 138 million children in labor, 50 million people in modern slavery, two trillion dollars in climate damages, a 69 percent collapse in wildlife populations. These are not unfortunate side effects of an otherwise beneficial system. These are the necessary inputs for the lifestyle that has come to be considered normal. Every cheap t-shirt, every affordable smartphone, every convenient meal represents a calculation that someone else's suffering is an acceptable price.
The Machinery of Looking Away
How do societies live with this knowledge? How do populations wake each morning, dress in clothes made by exploited hands, eat food harvested by children, and move through their days as if this were simply the natural order? The answer lies in sophisticated machinery that has been constructed to make the unbearable bearable, to transform the unacceptable into the inevitable.
At the individual level, people employ what psychologists call defense mechanisms—denial, dissociation, compartmentalization—psychological shields that protect against the full weight of systemic complicity. Denial allows populations to refuse the reality of exploitation, to dismiss reports of child labor as exaggerated or assume that conditions have improved. Dissociation enables the severing of connections between consumer choices and their consequences. Compartmentalization allows people to care deeply about injustice in the abstract while remaining unmoved by its concrete manifestations in daily life.
These are not character flaws but survival mechanisms in a system that would be psychologically unbearable if populations truly absorbed its full implications. The human mind is not designed to carry the weight of 138 million suffering children while maintaining the emotional equilibrium necessary for daily functioning. So societies learn not to carry it. They learn to see without seeing, to know without knowing, to care without caring enough to change.
But individual psychology alone cannot explain collective blindness. Entire cultures have constructed institutional mechanisms that make looking away not just possible, but socially rewarded, professionally advantageous, psychologically comfortable. Media systems, for instance, are designed to focus attention on spectacle rather than structure, on crisis rather than continuity, on the dramatic rather than the systematic. Populations are trained to respond to sudden violence—wars, disasters, attacks—while ignoring the steady drumbeat of everyday violence that makes such events possible.
The war in Gaza captured global attention precisely because it was visible, immediate, undeniable. Bodies in rubble make for compelling television, create shareable content, generate emotional responses that drive engagement metrics. But the bodies of children collapsing from exhaustion in textile factories do not. The slow poisoning of workers in electronics manufacturing plants does not. The gradual destruction of ecosystems to feed consumption does not. These forms of violence are too diffuse, too distant, too embedded in normal functioning to generate the outrage that drives news cycles.
This is not accidental. As media scholars have observed, capitalism has revealed itself to be "a perfect monster, adding individualized social media interactions, while distracting platform users from news" and creating information systems that prioritize engagement over understanding, sensation over analysis (FAIR, 2024). The result is a media landscape that excels at capturing attention for moments of crisis while systematically failing to help populations understand the systems that create those crises.
Consumer culture itself functions as a massive distraction machine, offering endless opportunities to express values through purchasing decisions while carefully avoiding any examination of the system that makes those purchases possible. Populations are encouraged to buy "ethical" products, to choose "sustainable" brands, to vote with their wallets—all while the fundamental structures of exploitation remain not just untouched but strengthened by participation in the illusion of choice.
The genius of this system lies in its ability to make people feel virtuous about their participation in it, to transform consumers into moral actors while leaving the system of consumption untouched. People can buy fair trade coffee while wearing clothes made in sweatshops. They can donate to children's charities while purchasing products made by child labor. They can express outrage about environmental destruction while maintaining lifestyles that depend on it. The system allows populations to feel good about themselves while changing nothing fundamental.
Businesses have perfected the art of enabling this cognitive dissonance. They create deliberately complex supply chains that make it nearly impossible for consumers to trace the origins of their products. They engage in what critics call "greenwashing" and "social washing"—marketing campaigns designed to convince consumers that they are acting ethically without requiring any meaningful change in business practices.
They lobby for voluntary corporate social responsibility standards rather than binding regulations, ensuring that their commitments to ethical behavior remain largely symbolic. As Nasreen Sheikh observes, "The result is decades of corporate social responsibility that is merely voluntary, modern slavery reporting legislation with no consequence for non-compliance, and greenwashing campaigns that could convince the savviest of consumers that they are acting ethically."
Perhaps most effectively, entire cultures have developed narratives that frame exploitation as inevitable, even beneficial. Populations are told that sweatshops provide jobs for people who would otherwise have none, as if the choice were between exploitation and starvation rather than between exploitation and dignity. They are told that child labor is a necessary step in economic development, as if there were some natural law requiring children to suffer for progress. They are told that environmental destruction is the price of prosperity, as if prosperity built on destruction could be anything but temporary.
These narratives transform victims into beneficiaries, exploitation into opportunity, and systemic violence into natural law. They make the unacceptable seem acceptable, the avoidable seem inevitable, the chosen seem fated.
The machinery of looking away operates largely below conscious awareness. Populations do not wake up each morning and decide to ignore the suffering that makes their lifestyle possible. They simply live within systems that make such ignorance the path of least resistance, that reward blindness and punish sight, that make it easier to look away than to look directly at what has been built and what it costs to maintain.
The Connections We Refuse to See
More than half a century ago, Martin Luther King Jr. identified what he called "the three evils of society"—the "giant triplets of racism, economic exploitation and militarism"—and understood something that has been largely forgotten: these forms of violence are not separate phenomena but interconnected expressions of the same underlying system. "We must see now that the evils of racism, economic exploitation and militarism are all tied together," he observed. "You can't really get rid of one without getting rid of the others" (The Atlantic, 2018).
The ongoing violence in Gaza offers a stark illustration of these connections. While global attention focused on the immediate horror, the economic machinery that enables and profits from such violence continued to operate largely unexamined. US-based corporations have been deeply complicit in Israel's violations of Palestinian human rights, providing weapons and military equipment used in attacks on Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon, and Syria.
The military-industrial complex that President Eisenhower warned about has metastasized into what scholars now describe as "a prototype widely imitated by other business sectors," creating what amounts to a permanent war economy that depends on conflict for its survival (Post Keynesian Economics, 2024). This extends far beyond arms manufacturers profiting from conflict, though they certainly do.
The deeper structural relationship between militarism and capitalism reveals how military domination and commercial exploitation have grown together throughout the history of imperialism. As one analysis notes, "Military domination and commercial exploitation developed side by side as the imperialist nations extended their conquest and occupation around the world" (Peace News, 2001).
The same logic that enables the systematic bombing of hospitals and schools in Gaza enables the systematic exploitation of workers in global supply chains. Both depend on the dehumanization of their victims, the reduction of human beings to acceptable losses in the pursuit of strategic or economic objectives. Both require the construction of narratives that justify the unjustifiable, that transform violence into necessity.
The parallels are clear: Israeli officials speak of "mowing the grass" in Gaza, reducing Palestinian lives to vegetation to be periodically cut down. Corporate executives speak of "human resources," reducing workers to inputs in a production process. Both languages serve the same function—they make it easier to inflict suffering by denying the full humanity of those who suffer.
The global economy that enables child labor in Sub-Saharan Africa is the same economy that enables weapons sales to authoritarian regimes. The supply chains that hide exploitation in textile factories are the same supply chains that hide the origins of conflict minerals. The financial systems that enable tax avoidance by multinational corporations are the same systems that enable money laundering for arms dealers. These are not separate problems requiring separate solutions; they are manifestations of a single system that prioritizes profit over human life.
The concept of "super-exploitation" helps explain how this system functions on a global scale. As dependency theorists have long argued, the profitability of the world's largest companies, centered in the rich world, depends upon the exploitation of workers centered in the Global South. This is not simply a matter of paying lower wages; it is about creating conditions where entire populations can be systematically excluded from the benefits of their own labor.
This dynamic becomes clearly visible in the aftermath of conflicts like Gaza. While Palestinian communities face destruction and displacement, reconstruction contracts flow to international corporations. While local economies are devastated, global markets continue to function smoothly, barely registering the human cost. The same pattern repeats across the Global South: conflict creates opportunities for capital accumulation, destruction becomes creative destruction, and human suffering becomes a business opportunity.
The environmental dimension reveals another crucial connection. The same extractive logic that drives military conquest drives ecological destruction. The same disregard for human life that enables war crimes enables climate crimes. The same short-term thinking that prioritizes immediate profit over long-term stability drives both military adventurism and environmental collapse.
Recent analysis suggests that "global capitalism has become dependent on war-making to sustain itself," creating what amounts to a permanent war economy mired in deep political and economic crisis (Truthout, 2022). This dependency is not accidental; it is structural. When an economic system requires constant growth on a finite planet, when it depends on the continuous expansion of markets and the endless extraction of resources, conflict becomes inevitable. Wars open new markets, destroy old infrastructure that must be rebuilt, and create new opportunities for capital accumulation.
The Gaza conflict, like so many others, serves multiple functions within this system. It provides markets for weapons manufacturers, opportunities for reconstruction contractors, and justification for increased military spending across the region. It also serves as a laboratory for new technologies of surveillance and control that can later be deployed against domestic populations.
The same companies that profit from the militarization of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict also profit from the militarization of borders, the expansion of prison systems, and the surveillance of social movements. The technologies of oppression developed in Gaza are exported to police departments in American cities, to border guards in European countries, to security forces in authoritarian regimes around the world.
This is why focusing solely on individual conflicts, while necessary, is ultimately insufficient. The violence witnessed in Gaza is not an aberration from the normal functioning of global capitalism; it is a concentrated expression of its everyday brutality. The same forces that enable the systematic bombing of refugee camps enable the systematic poisoning of water supplies by mining companies. The same logic that justifies collective punishment of Palestinian civilians justifies the collective punishment of Global South populations through structural adjustment programs and debt peonage.
Understanding these connections does not diminish the specific horror of what has happened in Gaza. If anything, it amplifies it by revealing the systematic nature of the violence. It also points toward the necessity of systemic solutions, the impossibility of addressing militarism without addressing economic exploitation, the futility of pursuing peace while maintaining systems that depend on violence for their survival.
Participation in the System
The most uncomfortable truth about the system that has been laid bare is not that it exists—systems of exploitation have always existed—but that entire populations participate in it with the regularity of breathing. Every day, through countless small choices and larger silences, societies cast votes for the continuation of exploitation.
This participation is not primarily a matter of individual moral failure. It is a structural feature of a system that makes ethical living nearly impossible while maintaining the illusion that choices matter, that people can somehow purchase their way to innocence in a marketplace built on exploitation.
Consider the simple act of clothing oneself each morning. The fabric that touches skin was likely woven in factories where workers face conditions that would be illegal in wealthier countries, where the air itself is poison and the hours stretch endlessly. The cotton may have been picked by children, the dyes may have poisoned rivers, the garments sewn by workers earning wages that mock human dignity.
Yet people put on these clothes without a second thought, not because they are callous, but because the alternative seems impossible. To spend hours researching the supply chain of every garment, to trace every thread back to its source—these alternatives exist only in theory, not in the practical world where people must live and work and function.
This is the genius of the system: it makes participation the path of least resistance while making resistance seem impractical, extreme, naive. Populations are offered the illusion of choice—fair trade coffee, organic cotton, sustainably sourced electronics—while the fundamental structures that create the need for such choices remain not just untouched but strengthened by participation in the illusion.
The myth of ethical consumption as a complete solution serves a crucial ideological function - it allows people to believe that they can shop their way to justice without any need for deeper structural change. But this does not mean that conscious consumption is meaningless. Rather, it means understanding both its potential and its limitations.
Conscious consumption can serve as an important starting point for moral awakening. When people begin to research supply chains, to ask questions about working conditions, to seek out alternatives to exploitative products, they often discover the systematic nature of the problems they are trying to address. The process of trying to consume ethically can become a form of education about the impossibility of consuming innocently under current conditions.
These individual choices also create market pressures that, while insufficient on their own, can force companies toward better practices. Fair trade certification, organic farming, and ethical manufacturing standards exist not because companies volunteered to be better, but because consumers demanded them and refused to accept exploitative alternatives. These improvements, while limited in scope, represent real benefits for the workers and communities they affect.
The key is understanding that companies do not respond to polite requests or moral appeals - they respond to pressure and consequences. When consumers organize boycotts, when they refuse to purchase from exploitative companies, when they make demands rather than requests, companies are forced to change or lose market share. Every company that has improved working conditions has done so because the cost of maintaining exploitative practices became higher than the cost of reform.
This requires moving beyond individual consumer choices toward collective consumer power. Isolated individuals making ethical purchasing decisions create marginal pressure. Organized consumers making coordinated demands and backing them up with economic consequences create the kind of pressure that forces systematic change. The most effective consumer movements have combined research, education, and coordinated economic pressure to force companies to transform their practices.
The problem arises when conscious consumption is treated as an end in itself rather than a beginning. When 138 million children are trapped in labor, when 50 million people live in modern slavery, when entire ecosystems collapse under the weight of consumption, individual purchasing decisions - however well-intentioned - cannot address the scale of systematic exploitation. The system that creates the need for "ethical" alternatives remains fundamentally unchanged.
More insidiously, the focus on consumer choice can deflect attention from the structural changes that would actually address these problems at their root. Instead of questioning why child labor exists at all, populations are encouraged to buy products that promise to be child-labor-free. Instead of challenging the economic system that makes exploitation profitable, people are offered the opportunity to purchase their way toward a cleaner conscience.
The most effective approach recognizes that individual actions and systemic transformation are not competing strategies but complementary ones. Conscious consumption can build awareness, create market pressure, and serve as a form of harm reduction while working toward larger changes. But it must be coupled with political action, collective organizing, and efforts to transform the systems that make exploitation profitable in the first place.
The goal is not to achieve perfect ethical purity through consumption - an impossible standard in a thoroughly compromised system - but to use individual choices as stepping stones toward collective action. Every person who begins to see the connections between their purchases and global exploitation becomes a potential ally in the work of systematic transformation. Every company forced to improve conditions because of consumer pressure creates a precedent that can be expanded through regulation and organizing.
Silence, too, is a form of participation. When populations know that their lifestyle depends on the suffering of others and choose not to speak about it, they become accomplices to that suffering. When they witness injustice and return to daily routines without demanding change, they signal acceptance of the status quo.
This silence is not simply a matter of individual choice; it is socially produced and rewarded. Speaking honestly about the violence that underpins modern life is socially awkward, professionally risky, psychologically exhausting. It is easier to focus on individual acts of charity than systemic acts of justice, easier to express sympathy for distant victims than to examine collective roles in their victimization.
The privilege of being able to look away is itself a form of participation. Those who benefit most from the current system—primarily those in the Global North—are precisely those who are most insulated from its costs. They can afford to ignore child labor because their children are not the ones laboring. They can afford to ignore environmental destruction because they are not the ones drinking poisoned water.
This privilege creates what scholars call "moral distance"—the psychological and physical separation that makes it possible to benefit from harm without feeling responsible for it. The greater the distance between populations and the consequences of their actions, the easier it becomes to ignore those consequences. Global supply chains are designed to maximize this distance.
Yet even acknowledging participation can become a form of participation if it leads to paralysis rather than action. The recognition that entire societies are embedded in systems of exploitation can produce a kind of nihilism—if everything is tainted, if there is no pure position from which to act, then why act at all? This response serves the interests of the system by transforming potential critics into passive observers.
The challenge is to hold two truths simultaneously: that populations are embedded in systems of exploitation, and that they retain the capacity to resist those systems. Participation is real, but it is not total. Choices are constrained, but they are not eliminated. Individual actions are insufficient, but they are not meaningless.
Now That We've Seen
So here we arrive, carrying knowledge that cannot be unknown, seeing connections that cannot be unseen. The comfortable illusions that once made daily life bearable have been stripped away, replaced by uncomfortable clarity about the world that has been built and everyone's place within it.
But perhaps the most crucial understanding that emerges is not just what the system does, but how it sustains itself. This is a system that needs populations to keep consuming—to never stop, never pause, never question the endless cycle of acquisition that drives its machinery. It needs people isolated, lost, and consuming, disconnected from each other and from any sources of meaning that might compete with the marketplace.
The isolation is not accidental. Atomized individuals make better consumers than connected communities. People who feel lost and empty are more likely to seek fulfillment through purchasing than those who find meaning in relationships, creativity, or collective purpose. The system has learned that lonely people buy more things, that anxious people consume more products, that disconnected people are more susceptible to the promise that the next purchase will finally fill the void.
This is why consumer culture works so hard to keep populations in a state of perpetual dissatisfaction, always reaching for the next product, the next upgrade, the next solution to problems that consumption itself creates. It is why advertising focuses not on the utility of products but on the emotional states they promise to deliver. It is why the system promotes individualism over community, competition over cooperation, acquisition over creation.
The environmental destruction, the child labor, the modern slavery—these are not unfortunate side effects. They are the necessary fuel for a machine that requires endless growth on a finite planet, endless consumption by populations who have been systematically disconnected from other sources of meaning. The suffering of the exploited enables the consumption of the consumers, who are themselves trapped in cycles that leave them isolated and searching for something that consumption can never actually provide.
Gaza continues to burn while this analysis unfolds. The system that enabled the violence there continues to operate with even less scrutiny now that media attention has shifted elsewhere. The children may have disappeared from social media feeds, but they continue to labor in supply chains. The environmental destruction may have slipped from immediate attention, but it continues to accelerate. The machinery of exploitation does not pause—it depends on distraction, on isolation, on the endless cycle of consumption that keeps populations too busy, too tired, too disconnected to organize effective resistance.
The question that emerges is not whether this knowledge is true—the evidence surrounds us. The question is what can be done with this truth now that it lives in collective consciousness.
The easy answers—shop more ethically, vote for better politicians, donate to worthy causes—are not wrong, but they are insufficient. They treat symptoms while leaving the disease untouched. The hard truth is that the problems described cannot be solved within the framework that created them.
This does not mean that individual actions are meaningless. Every choice to see rather than look away, to speak rather than remain silent, to connect rather than remain isolated, matters. But it means that individual actions must be connected to collective movements, personal transformation must be linked to political transformation.
The knowledge now carried is dangerous to a system that depends on ignorance for its survival. The discomfort felt is a threat to a system that requires comfort for its continuation. The refusal to look away is an act of resistance in a world that depends on blindness. The question is how to transform this individual resistance into collective power.
History offers examples of such transformations. The abolition of slavery, the struggle for workers' rights, the fight for civil rights—all began with individuals who refused to accept the unacceptable, who chose to see what others preferred to ignore. None of these movements achieved perfect justice, but all of them proved that systems that seem permanent can be changed.
The system described—global capitalism in its current form—is not eternal. It is a human creation, which means it can be humanly transformed. It has not always existed, which means it need not always exist. It serves particular interests, which means it can be made to serve different interests.
But perhaps most importantly, the question is whether people will choose connection over isolation, community over consumption, solidarity over individual salvation. The system depends on keeping populations isolated, lost, and consuming. Its greatest fear is not individual ethical consumption but collective action, not better shopping choices but communities that find meaning outside the marketplace, not reformed capitalism but people who discover that their deepest needs cannot be met by purchasing products but only by connecting with each other and working together to build something different.
The children trapped in labor, the workers enslaved in factories, the communities poisoned by extraction, the ecosystems destroyed by consumption—they cannot wait for populations to feel ready, cannot pause their suffering while discomfort is overcome. They need action now, with the knowledge that exists, from the positions occupied, with the resources possessed.
The choice is not between purity and participation—that choice does not exist in a thoroughly compromised world. The choice is between conscious participation and conscious resistance, between passive acceptance and active opposition, between comfortable isolation and uncomfortable connection. It is the choice between the world as it is and the world as it could be.
The question that should haunt collective consciousness is not how such a system came to exist. The question is what will be done now that its true nature is known, now that the curtain has been pulled back, now that ignorance can no longer be claimed as an excuse. Now that the blood in collective hands has been seen, the weight of participation felt, the connections between comfort and suffering understood—what will be done?
This is not a call to guilt, but a call to action. Not a demand for perfection, but a plea for presence. Not a requirement for individual salvation, but an invitation to collective transformation. The world is watching, history is waiting, and the future is unwritten. The only question that matters is what story will be told with collective lives, what legacy will be left for those who come after.
The choice exists. The time is now. The question remains: What will be done?
If you value this kind of writing, please consider subscribing to Plague Island.
We don’t hide our work behind a paywall, because we want it to be read. But if you can support it, we’ll use that support to keep writing more, and writing better.
Paid subscribers receive early access, behind-the-scenes newsletters, and the chance to shape future essays.
We write with rigour, we cite everything, and we answer only to our readers.
Or please support us with a one-off tip → Buy Me a Coffee
References
FAIR (2024) 'We Need to Separate Capitalism and Journalism', 6 March. Available online: https://fair.org/home/we-need-to-separate-capitalism-and-journalism/ [Accessed 28 June 2025].
The Guardian (2025) 'Climate crisis on track to destroy capitalism, warns top insurer', 3 April. Available online: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/apr/03/climate-crisis-on-track-to-destroy-capitalism-warns-allianz-insurer[Accessed 28 June 2025].
Peace News (2001) 'Military violence and economic exploitation', 1 March. Available online: https://peacenews.info/node/3631/military-violence-and-economic-exploitation [Accessed 28 June 2025].
Post Keynesian Economics (2024) 'The military-industrial complex as a variety of capitalism and threat to democracy'. Working Paper 2409.
The Atlantic (2018) 'Martin Luther King Jr. Saw Three Evils in the World', 7 March. Available online: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/02/martin-luther-king-hungry-club-forum/552533/ [Accessed 28 June 2025].
Truthout (2022) 'Global Capitalism Has Become Dependent on War-Making to Sustain Itself', 24 April. Available online: https://truthout.org/articles/global-capitalism-has-become-dependent-on-war-making-to-sustain-itself/ [Accessed 28 June 2025].
UNICEF (2025) 'Despite progress, child labour still affects 138 million children globally – ILO, UNICEF', 11 June. Available online: https://www.unicef.org/press-releases/despite-progress-child-labour-still-affects-138-million-children-globally-ilo-unicef [Accessed 28 June 2025].
Walk Free (2025) 'Consumerism: The real price of our purchases'. Global Slavery Index. Available online: https://www.walkfree.org/global-slavery-index/findings/essays/consumerism-the-real-price-of-our-purchases/ [Accessed 28 June 2025].