The Age of Denial: Power, Decline, and the Silence Around Trump
The post arrived on Easter Sunday, a day traditionally reserved for reflection and renewal. Instead, the Commander-in-Chief of the United States armed forces used the occasion to issue a threat of global escalation, wrapped in profanity and a dissonant religious taunt. “Tuesday will be Power Plant Day, and Bridge Day, all wrapped up in one, in Iran,” Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social. “There will be nothing like it!!! Open the Fuckin’ Strait, you crazy bastards, or you’ll be living in Hell - JUST WATCH! Praise be to Allah. President DONALD J. TRUMP” (Trump, 2026).
This is the President of the United States. He is the man with the nuclear codes, whose word can move aircraft carriers and flatten cities, threatening to destroy the civilian infrastructure of a sovereign nation while mocking the faith of over two billion people. On Easter Sunday. The Council on American-Islamic Relations immediately condemned the post as a “deranged mocking of Islam,” noting that his threats to attack civilian infrastructure constituted potential war crimes (Council on American-Islamic Relations, 2026). The Interfaith Alliance described it as a “profane and violent rant on Christianity’s holiest day while insulting Muslims” (Anadolu Agency, 2026). Iran’s embassy in Thailand posted on X that “POTUS swears like a teenager,” adding that “it seems the US has reached the Stone Age sooner than expected” (India Today, 2026).
The teenager comparison is more apt than perhaps intended. There is something adolescent about the post: the capitalisation, the exclamation marks, the profanity deployed for shock value, the religious provocation thrown in as a kind of verbal grenade. But teenagers do not have access to the world’s largest nuclear arsenal, and they’re not directing a war in the Middle East. Teenagers do not set the terms of engagement for a conflict that could reshape the global order. The gap between the tone of the message and the gravity of the office from which it was sent is not only embarrassing; it is terrifying.
But the true horror of the moment lies not in the religious insult, nor even in the profanity. It lies in the fact that the man holding the most powerful office on earth is exhibiting the classic, observable symptoms of cognitive decline — and the entire American political apparatus has decided to look the other way.
The Shift
Over the past year, we have witnessed an observable behavioural shift in Donald Trump that goes far beyond the combative, provocative style that has defined his political career. The Trump of 2016, whatever else one might say about him, was capable of strategic calculation. He could read a room, modulate his message for different audiences, and exercise a crude but effective form of political discipline. He knew when to escalate and when to retreat. He understood, instinctively if not intellectually, the difference between provocation and self-destruction. The Trump of 2026 is a different creature entirely. The filter is gone. The calculation has been replaced by something rawer, more volatile, and far more dangerous.
The evidence is not subtle. He has been alienating traditional allies with increasingly erratic behaviour that serves no discernible strategic purpose. In recent weeks alone, he insulted the wife of French President Emmanuel Macron during a rant about NATO, prompting what the press described as a “clapback” from Macron that signalled Europe had finally reached its limit with American belligerence (iNews, 2026). He threatened to cut off “all” trade with Spain — a NATO ally — in a response so disproportionate that it baffled even sympathetic commentators. Representative Adam Smith, the ranking Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee, expressed amazement at the degree to which Trump has been “alienating” the very allies whose cooperation he needs for his own stated foreign policy objectives (Yahoo News, 2026). Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer described Trump’s address to the nation on Iran as “rambling” and “disjointed,” the speech of an “unhinged” president who had failed to justify his own war (The Guardian, 2026).
His public schedule has contracted dramatically too. The New York Times reported in late 2025 that Trump had cut his official appearances by nearly forty percent compared to his first term, with public events now rarely beginning before noon. This marks a stark contrast to the 10:30am starts that characterised his earlier presidency (The New York Times, 2025). During a seventy-five-minute Cabinet meeting in December 2025, The Washington Post counted nine separate instances in which the president appeared to fall asleep, his eyes closing for extended periods while his advisors spoke beside him. In the same meeting, Trump told his Cabinet: “I’m the only president that ever took a cognitive test,” a boast that, in context, reads like a man protesting too much (The Washington Post, 2025). When confronted with questions about his health, Trump responded threateningly, posting on Truth Social that discussing his cognitive fitness was “seditious, perhaps even treasonous” (Time, 2025).
Most tellingly, his speech patterns are deteriorating in ways that are clinically significant. Harry Segal, a senior lecturer in psychology at Cornell University, has identified Trump’s increasing tendency toward phonemic paraphasia — the swapping of parts of words for others that sound similar — as a recognised sign of early dementia (Cornell Chronicle, 2024). This is not the same as a verbal slip or a momentary lapse. Phonemic paraphasia follows a specific, identifiable neurological pattern. Segal noted that while the complaints about Biden were “more vague — citing advanced age, physical fragility and occasional mixing up of names,” with “no evidence of dementia onset, no sun-downing,” Trump’s errors are qualitatively different. They are the mistakes of a brain that is misfiring.
When a leader begins to mistake words in this way, loses his train of thought mid-sentence, confuses his political opponents with former presidents, and responds to routine questions with escalating hostility, it raises profound questions about his fitness for office. Yet these questions remain largely unasked by the people in a position to demand answers.
The Biden Mirror
Less than two years ago, the American political and media establishments engaged in a relentless, coordinated campaign to force Joe Biden from the presidential race due to concerns about his cognitive fitness. The pressure was immense; the coverage was wall-to-wall. Every stumble, every verbal slip, every moment of hesitation was amplified, analysed, and presented as evidence that the man was unfit for office. Biden, under extraordinary pressure from his own party, withdrew from the 2024 race. The system worked, his critics said. The guardrails held.
But the guardrails, it turns out, are selective. They apply to one kind of decline and not another. Biden’s decline was characterised by physical frailty, verbal stumbling, and a general slowing down — the kind of decline that reads, in the brutal visual grammar of television, as weakness. It was the decline of a man winding down: quieter, slower, more hesitant. Trump’s decline is characterised by something entirely different: aggression, disinhibition, and rage. Because his base misinterprets this aggression as strength, and his anti-establishment energy as authenticity, the decline is not recognised as decline at all. It is reframed as charisma. The angry old man is not losing his mind, but rather “telling it like it is.” The profanity is not a loss of impulse control, it is instead “straight talk.” The threats are not the ravings of a man who cannot regulate his own behaviour, they are “strength.”
This is the double standard at the heart of American political culture. One candidate was removed under intense pressure because he looked old. Another continues to govern, despite increasingly erratic and dangerous public behaviour, because he looks angry. The Republicans who held Senate hearings on Biden’s mental fitness in June 2025, who published the “Biden Autopen Presidency” report through the House Oversight Committee, who spent months demanding cognitive testing and medical transparency, have fallen entirely silent now that the same questions apply to their own man. The Guardian noted in August 2025 that “Biden was hounded for his age-related gaffes, but Trump’s increasingly strange behaviour has largely been ignored” (The Guardian, 2025).
The question must be asked: what threshold triggers concern? Who decides? And why is one form of decline disqualifying, while another is permitted to hold the levers of global destruction? Half of Americans now believe the president is suffering from cognitive decline, according to YouGov polling. Yet the political class treats this as an impolite observation rather than a constitutional crisis.
Subscribe to Notes From Plague Island and join our growing community of readers and thinkers.
The Potemkin Office
The Trump family, however, is not unfamiliar with this territory. They know exactly what cognitive decline looks like, because they have managed it in private while projecting stability in public. In October 1991, Fred Trump Sr., the patriarch of the family empire, was diagnosed with “mild senile dementia.” By 1992, medical records showed he could not remember his own birthday, did not know his age, and scored below the fifteenth percentile for cognitive function. After a thirty-minute delay, his recall ability was assessed as “nil” (The Washington Post, 2024). The symptoms were unmistakable and heartbreaking in equal measure: he would get out of his limousine at traffic lights and walk away. He would scream at his wife. He once wore three ties at the same time. At Donald’s 1993 wedding to Marla Maples, where he served as best man, Fred had to be repeatedly reminded why he was there.
What the family did next is instructive, and it is the key to understanding what is happening in Washington today. They built what can only be described as a Potemkin office. Every morning, a chauffeur would drive Fred Sr. to his office in Brooklyn, where he would sit at the same desk he had occupied for decades. He would sign blank pieces of paper. His phone was disconnected; it rang only through to a secretary in the lobby who was paid to play along. The entire production was designed to maintain the illusion of control, because familiarity kept him calm. Without it, there was agitation, confusion, and outbursts (Mary Trump, 2020). The man believed he was still running the empire, but the empire had long since moved on without him.
While Fred Sr. was kept comfortable in his theatrical workspace, the real decisions were being made elsewhere. Donald himself attempted to have his father’s lawyer draft a codicil giving him control of the estate and tried to slide it in front of Fred “as if it had been Fred’s idea.” Fred, on a rare lucid day, called his daughter Maryanne, who discovered the scheme (The Washington Post, 2024). The patriarch died in 1999 with less than two million dollars to his name. His children sold the company for seven hundred million five years later.
The pattern is clear: a declining figurehead is not a problem for the people around him; he is an opportunity. He signs what is put in front of him. He does not ask difficult questions. He does not challenge the agenda of those who manage him. He is, in the most cynical sense, the perfect vessel.
Donald’s nephew, Fred Trump III, has watched his uncle’s deterioration with the grim recognition of someone who has seen this film before. He recently told People magazine that he observes his uncle’s decline “in parallel with the way my grandfather’s decline was,” and warned bluntly: “It runs in the family. If anyone wants to believe that dementia did not run in the Trump family, it’s just not true” (People, 2024). His aunt Maryanne Trump Barry had dementia. His cousin John Walter had dementia. Mary Trump, the president’s niece and a clinical psychologist, has said she sees the same “deer in the headlights” look in her uncle that she remembers in her grandfather. The family tree is not ambiguous.
Good Genes
Trump has long been a proponent of what he calls “racehorse theory:” the belief that superior genetics produce superior people, and the Trump bloodline is simply better stock. At a rally in Bemidji, Minnesota, in September 2020, he told a nearly all-white crowd: “You have good genes, you know that, right?” (Rolling Stone, 2020). He has repeatedly declared himself “a big believer in genes.” In October 2024, he told Hugh Hewitt that immigrants who commit murder have “bad genes” (NBC News, 2024). As recently as March 2026, at the Future Investment Initiative summit in Miami, he boasted that his son Don Jr. has “the greatest genes in history” (Irish Star, 2026).
The cruel irony of his own framework is that it does not discriminate. If traits pass through bloodlines — if greatness is hereditary, as he has spent a lifetime insisting — then so does decline. And decline, in the Trump family, is not a question of if. It is a question of when.
Dr. John Gartner, a psychologist formerly affiliated with Johns Hopkins University, has noted that Trump has taken the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) at least three times. “If you’re giving it to him three times,” Gartner observed, “that means you’re not assessing dementia. That means you’re monitoring dementia” (The Guardian, 2025). The White House has refused to answer when the cognitive tests were taken, or to release the results. The man who boasted about acing a test designed to detect cognitive impairment has taken it three times and will not tell anyone what it showed.
What Science Tells Us
We have to be clear and say we cannot diagnose a public figure from afar. But we can observe, and we can compare what we observe with what the medical literature describes, and the comparison is difficult to ignore.
Fred Trump Sr. was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease, which is primarily characterised by memory loss — the forgetting of names, dates, and familiar routines. It is the quiet form of decline: the slow erasure of a life’s accumulated knowledge. Donald Trump’s observable symptoms, however, align more closely with a different condition: the behavioural variant of Frontotemporal Dementia, known as bvFTD. According to the Mayo Clinic, the hallmarks of bvFTD include extreme changes in behaviour, increasingly inappropriate social behaviour, loss of empathy, lack of judgment, and severe loss of inhibition. Physical and verbal aggression are common, and they tend to appear earlier in the disease course than in other forms of dementia (Mayo Clinic, 2025). It is the loud form of decline: not a fading, but a coarsening.
Consider the symptoms against the evidence. Increasingly inappropriate social behaviour: threatening to destroy a nation’s civilian infrastructure while mocking its religion, on Easter Sunday. Loss of empathy: dismissing the concerns of allies, insulting foreign leaders and their spouses, showing no regard for the civilian populations his rhetoric endangers. Lack of judgment: posting profanity-laden threats on social media that undermine his own diplomatic position and hand propaganda victories to his adversaries. Severe loss of inhibition: the profanity, the aggression, the inability to modulate tone or message for context, the posting of threats that his own advisors must scramble to contextualise. Physical and verbal aggression: the escalating threats, the “crazy bastards,” the promise that nations will “be living in Hell.”
We are not making a diagnosis. Instead, we are noting a pattern of behaviour that is consistent with a well-documented neurological condition, in a man with a documented family history of dementia, who is now seventy-nine years old, who has taken cognitive tests at least three times, and whose own family members have publicly warned that “it runs in the family.” The pattern is there. The question is why nobody in power is willing to acknowledge it.
The New Potemkin Office
The answer, we suspect, is the same one that applied in Brooklyn in the 1990s. A declining figurehead is useful. The men and women surrounding Trump — figures like JD Vance, Stephen Miller, and Marco Rubio — are playing the role of the secretary in the lobby. They are managing a declining patriarch because a declining patriarch who believes he is in charge is the perfect vessel for their own agendas. They write the executive orders. They shape the policies. They build the authoritarian state while the man at the top signs whatever is put in front of him and posts unhinged threats on social media that serve as useful distractions from the machinery operating behind the curtain.
Just as Fred Sr.’s family maintained the illusion of control to keep him calm and compliant, Trump’s inner circle maintains the illusion of presidential authority to keep the base loyal and the agenda moving. The phone lines are not literally disconnected, but the effect is the same: the man in the chair believes he is running the show, and the people around him are content to let him believe it, because the alternative — a lucid, engaged, questioning president — would be far more inconvenient for their purposes. A president who asks “why are we doing this?” is a problem. A president who signs the paper and goes back to Truth Social is an absolute gift.
This is the logical extension of a pattern that the Trump family itself established decades ago. The precedent is documented. The only difference is the scale: this time, the Potemkin office is the Oval Office, and the blank papers being signed are executive orders that reshape the lives of hundreds of millions of people.
The Culture of Denial
The refusal to acknowledge the obvious is not unique to the Trump administration. It is a hallmark of authoritarian systems, where the truth is subordinated to the needs of the party and the leader’s ego. In the Soviet Union, the declining health of successive General Secretaries was treated as a state secret, their frailty hidden behind carefully managed public appearances until the moment they collapsed. The principle is the same everywhere it appears: the leader cannot be weak, because the leader’s weakness is the system’s weakness. And so, the system lies and the people around the leader lie, and the public is expected to believe the lie or at least to pretend to believe it.
America is now operating under the same principle. Trump’s supporters reinterpret his aggression as strength, his disinhibition as authenticity, his erratic behaviour as anti-establishment energy. His critics hesitate to raise cognitive concerns for fear of appearing partisan, or of “medicalising politics,” or of being accused of the same ageism that was deployed against Biden. The result is a vacuum, a space where serious questions are never properly asked, where the most powerful man on earth is permitted to exhibit behaviour that would trigger an immediate medical evaluation in any other professional context, and where the political class collectively agrees to pretend that everything is normal.
It is not normal. A man who posts “Open the Fuckin’ Strait, you crazy bastards” on Easter Sunday while mocking Islam is not exhibiting the behaviour of a stable leader. A man who falls asleep in Cabinet meetings, who has cut his public schedule by forty percent, who confuses names and swaps words with increasing frequency, who threatens to destroy nations in language that reads like a bar fight rather than a geopolitical strategy — this is not a man who is well. And the fact that America is taking this, that the political class is too cowardly to invoke the 25th Amendment, that the media is too afraid of appearing biased to state the obvious, is a symptom of a democratic culture in terminal decline.
Senator Bernie Sanders, to his credit, has been among the few willing to say what others will not. Following the Easter post, he described Trump as an “unhinged madman” and questioned his mental acuity, joining a growing chorus of Democratic lawmakers calling for the invocation of the 25th Amendment (Hindustan Times, 2026). But the calls remain marginal, the pressure insufficient, and the Republican Party — the party that spent two years demanding Biden’s removal on cognitive grounds — remains in a state of calculated silence.
The Risk of Looking Away
There is something unspeakably sad about dementia. It is the cruellest of thefts, not of life, but of self. It takes the person before it takes the body, leaving the face intact while hollowing out everything behind it. Anyone who has watched a parent or grandparent disappear into that fog knows the particular grief of being recognised and not recognised in the same moment, of hearing familiar words arranged in unfamiliar ways, of watching someone you love become a stranger wearing a beloved face.
Fred Trump Sr. spent his final years in that fog. He sat at his desk. He signed his name. He believed, on his better days, that he was still the man he had always been. His family let him believe it, because the alternative was worse for him, and for them. There was, in that small mercy, something human.
But there is nothing merciful about what is happening now. The man in the chair today is not signing blank papers in a Brooklyn office. He is signing executive orders in the West Wing. He is not threatening a secretary on a disconnected phone. He is threatening sovereign nations on a platform with millions of followers. The risks in this context are not to a family business, but to civilisation.
We do not claim to diagnose Donald J. Trump. But we can observe and note the pattern: the aggression, the disinhibition, the contracting schedule, the deteriorating speech, the rage that escalates where it once calculated. We can document the family history that his own relatives have made public. We can read the medical literature and recognise the overlap. And we can ask the question that the American political establishment has decided is too dangerous, too impolite, too inconvenient to ask: is the President of the United States cognitively fit to hold office?
The silence that greets that question is cowardice. It is the same cowardice that hounded Joe Biden from the race while averting its eyes from the man who replaced him. It is the cowardice of a political class that has decided a useful monster is preferable to an honest reckoning.
Decline is not a moral failing. It is the price of a long life, and it comes for all of us is we are fortunate to live that long. But when decline meets power — when the fading mind holds the nuclear codes and the rage of a deteriorating brain is cheered as authenticity — then decline is no longer a private tragedy. It is a public catastrophe. The people who could stop it, who possess the constitutional tools and the political authority to intervene, have chosen instead to do what the Trump family has always done: maintain the illusion, manage the patriarch, and hope that nobody notices the phone has been dead for years.
Or support us with a one-off tip → Buy Me a Coffee
References
Anadolu Agency (2026) ‘US Muslim group condemns Trump’s inflammatory post, calls on Congress to reconvene to end Iran war’, 5 April. Available at: https://www.aa.com.tr/en/americas/us-muslim-group-condemns-trumps-inflammatory-post-calls-on-congress-to-reconvene-to-end-iran-war/3893038 [Accessed: 4 April 2026].
Cornell Chronicle (2024) ‘Cornell expert says Trump’s frequent phonemic paraphasia are signs of early dementia’, 11 March. Available at: https://news.cornell.edu/media-relations/tip-sheets/cornell-expert-says-trumps-frequent-phonemic-paraphasia-are-signs-early [Accessed: 5 April 2026].
Council on American-Islamic Relations (2026) ‘CAIR Calls on Congress to Reconvene and End Iran War After Pres. Trump Posts Message Threatening New War Crimes, Mocking Islam’, 5 April. Available at: https://www.cair.com/press_releases/cair-calls-on-congress-to-reconvene-and-end-iran-war-after-pres-trump-posts-message-threatening-new-war-crimes-mocking-islam/ [Accessed: 6 April 2026].
Hindustan Times (2026) ‘Unhinged madman: Bernie Sanders, other Dems question Trump’s mental acuity after Iran post amid 25th Amendment calls’, 6 April. Available at: https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/us-news/unhinged-madman-bernie-sanders-other-dems-question-trumps-mental-acuity-after-iran-post-amid-25th-amendment-calls-101775459978383.html [Accessed: 6 April 2026].
iNews (2026) ‘The Macron clapback that shows Europe has had it with Trump’, 4 April. Available at: https://inews.co.uk/news/world/macron-clapback-shows-europe-had-it-trump-4334786 [Accessed: 5 April 2026].
Irish Star (2026) ‘Trump claims Don Jr. has “greatest genes in history” but snubs other children’, 27 March. Available at: https://www.irishstar.com/news/politics/trump-don-jr-genes-snub-36936368 [Accessed: 6 April
2026].
Mayo Clinic (2025) ‘Frontotemporal dementia - Symptoms and causes’. Available at: https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/frontotemporal-dementia/symptoms-causes/syc-20354737 [Accessed: 4 April 2026].
NBC News (2024) ‘Trump suggests
immigrants have “bad genes” in latest disparagement of migrants’, 7
October. Available at: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-suggests-immigrants-bad-genes-latest-disparagement-migrants-rcna174271 [Accessed: 6 April
2026].
People (2024 ) ‘Donald Trump’s Nephew Fred Trump III Reminds of Family’s History with Dementia’, 3 November. Available at: https://people.com/fred-trump-family-history-dementia-donald-behavior-exclusive-8738427 [Accessed: 5 April 2026].
Rolling Stone (2020) ‘What Is the Racehorse Theory? Trump Touts White Supremacy in Minnesota’, 22 September. Available at: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/trump-white-supremacy-racehorse-theory-1064928/[Accessed: 4 April 2026].
The Guardian (2025) ‘Biden was hounded for his age-related gaffes, but Trump’s increasingly strange behaviour has largely been ignored’, 3 August. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/aug/03/donald-trump-mental-fitness [Accessed: 6 April 2026].
The Guardian (2026) ‘Unhinged madman: US politicians react to Trump’s expletive-laden threat to Iran’, 5 April. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/apr/05/trump-iran-threats-politician-reactions [Accessed: 5 April 2026].
The New York Times (2025) ‘Trump’s Schedule Shows a President Slowing Down’, 2 December. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/02/us/politics/trump-schedule-appearances.html [Accessed: 4 April 2026].
The Washington Post (2024) ‘Shadowing Trump’s attacks on mental fitness — his own father’s dementia’, 20 March. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/03/20/donald-trump-dementia-father-fred-alzheimers-biden/[Accessed: 5 April 2026].
The Washington Post (2025 ) ‘Trump appears to doze during Cabinet meeting’, 2 December. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/12/02/donald-trump-drowsy-cabinet-meeting/ [Accessed: 6 April 2026].
Time (2025) ‘Trump Calls Reports on His Health ‘Treasonous,’’ 10 December. Available at: https://time.com/7339756/trump-age-health-cognitive-test-new-york-times-treasonous-sedition/ [Accessed 6 April 2026].
Trump, Mary L. (2020) Too Much and Never Enough: How My Family Created the World’s Most Dangerous Man. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Trump, D. J. (2026 ) Truth Social post, 5 April. Available at: https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump [Accessed: 6 April 2026].
Yahoo News (2026) ‘Congressman Says “Jackass” Trump Has Been “Alienating” Key Allies’, 3 April. Available at: https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/congressman-says-jackass-trump-alienating-004527380.html [Accessed: 4 April 2026].
YouGov (2026) ‘Half of Americans say Donald Trump is too old to be president; 36% say he is not’, 14 January. Available at: https://yougov.com/en-us/articles/53893-half-of-americans-say-donald-trump-is-too-old-to-be-president [Accessed: 6 April
2026].