Part 6: The Silicon Valley Kingmaker: Neocameralism's Corporate Takeover and the Dehumanizing Logic of the CEO-Ruler

The Unchecked Executive. (Illustration by Dale Stephanos.)

Part 1: The Dark Enlightenment Lens: Understanding the Slow Strangulation of Democracy

Part 2: The Shadow of Christian Nationalism: J.D. Vance, the Vice Presidency, and the Threat to Pluralism

Part 3: Silicon Valley's Unholy Alliance: How Tech Wealth Powers the New Religious Right

Part 4: From Heidegger to Here: The Philosophical Roots of America's Alt Right

Part 5: Accelerating Toward Autocracy: Nick Land's Vision and Its Implementation

In the turbulent currents of modern political thought, few ideas challenge the foundations of democratic life as profoundly as Neocameralism. Born from the digital ether and nurtured in the incubator of Silicon Valley ideology, this philosophy, developed by software engineer Curtis Yarvin (writing as Mencius Moldbug), proposes a chilling transformation: running countries like corporations. Imagine a nation governed not by elected representatives accountable to citizens, but by a CEO-ruler, answerable only to shareholders, where efficiency and profit eclipse human rights and the public good. This demonstrated a fundamental reimagining of the human relationship to power, one that threatens to strip away agency, dignity, and the very essence of democratic citizenship.

In our previous Plague Island examination of the Dark Enlightenment (a philosophical movement rejecting modern democratic values), we identified Neocameralism as the central pillar of a broader intellectual assault on democracy, equality, and the Enlightenment's legacy. "Neocameralism envisions replacing our current system not with reformed democracy, but with explicitly hierarchical, technology-driven authoritarian regimes - governance modelled, chillingly, on the absolute control of a CEO or the fixed order of a pre-modern monarchy, amplified by 21st-century technology" (Plague Island, 2025a). Once dismissed as the fringe ramblings of online subcultures, these ideas have found fertile ground in the immense wealth and influence of Silicon Valley and manifesting in the actions of powerful political figures. The abstract theory is becoming a concrete reality, with potentially devastating consequences for real people in America and across the globe.

This article dissects Neocameralism's core tenets, traces its intellectual lineage, and maps its alarming ascent. More crucially, it confronts the human cost of this ideology, exploring how its machine-like logic threatens to erode democratic norms, individual freedoms, and the very fabric of community. By examining the real-world implementation of these principles, particularly within the Trump administration, we expose the tangible dangers of a governance model that views citizens as mere data points or customers, and democracy as an inefficient bug to be eliminated. Understanding this anti-democratic blueprint is an urgent necessity for anyone concerned with preserving human dignity and self-governance in the face of a technologically supercharged authoritarianism.

From Fringe to Frontline: The Dark Origins and Rising Influence of Neocameralism

Curtis Yarvin, a software engineer steeped in the logic of code and systems, launched his blog ‘Unqualified Reservations’ in 2007. Under the pseudonym Mencius Moldbug, he articulated a profound disillusionment with democracy, viewing it not as a system of self-governance but as an inefficient, chaotic mess prone to manipulation and decay. His solution, born from a programmer's desire for order and control, was Neocameralism. Yarvin sought to replace the perceived messiness of human political interaction with the clean, hierarchical lines of corporate management, applied to the scale of a nation.

Yarvin and his distorted realities.

His intellectual toolkit drew from thinkers who shared his disdain for democracy. As we noted in our analysis, these include "19th-century political philosopher Thomas Carlyle […] American 20th-century political theorist James Burnham […] and economist Hans-Hermann Hoppe" (Plague Island, 2025a), all proponents of elite rule or sceptical of democratic processes. Yarvin repurposed the term ‘cameralism,’ an old German approach focused on efficient state administration, but twisted it into a modern corporate framework, prioritising shareholder value (represented by the elite) over citizen well-being.

This vision found a powerful amplifier in Nick Land and his ‘Dark Enlightenment’ essays. Land's accelerationist framework - the idea of pushing technological and capitalist forces to their extreme to trigger societal collapse and rebirth - provided a dynamic, almost viral quality to Yarvin's static corporate model. Our examination of Land's philosophy highlighted this fusion, creating a potent ideology that sees democracy not as flawed but as obsolete, an impediment to a technologically determined future governed by cold, hard efficiency (Plague Island, 2025b). The human element, with its messy emotions, diverse values, and demands for participation, is treated as a system inefficiency to be engineered out.

Democracy Inc.: The State as a Corporate Machine, Citizens as Customers

Neocameralism is a blueprint for dismantling democratic society and replacing it with a system modelled on corporate hierarchy. Its core principles, when translated into practice, have profound and often dehumanising consequences for individuals and communities.

At its heart, Neocameralism views the nation-state as just another business. Government becomes a private company, focused solely on efficiency, order, and profit. In this cold calculus, citizens are stripped of their rights and agency, reduced to mere customers purchasing services. Your value is determined not by your inherent dignity as a human being, but by your utility to the corporate state. Public services are no longer rights but products, offered or withheld based on cost-benefit analyses that ignore human need. Taxation becomes a fee for service, and citizenship itself transforms into a conditional customer relationship, easily terminated if you become unprofitable or inconvenient.

America; just not as we know it.

This transactional view obliterates the civic bonds that hold societies together. As described succinctly: "Neocameralism = Sovereign State as Software Corporation" (19keys, 2025). It's a vision of society run like code, optimised for shareholder value, where human needs and democratic aspirations are treated as bugs in the system.

We see echoes of this logic in the Trump administration's relentless drive for deregulation, exemplified by the "10-to-1" initiative demanding the repeal of ten regulations for every new one introduced (White House, 2025b). This treats vital protections for the environment, worker safety, and consumer rights not as expressions of the public will or safeguards for human well-being, but as mere corporate liabilities. They are obstacles on the balance sheet to be ruthlessly eliminated in the pursuit of profit and efficiency.

The Executive Unleashed: The CEO-Ruler and the Erosion of Accountability

Power under Neocameralism coalesces into a single, unchecked executive: the CEO-ruler. This figure governs not by democratic mandate but by ownership or sheer operational control, accountable only to a select group of 'shareholders' (the wealthy elite) rather than the populace. Democratic checks and balances, messy debates, and public input are seen as friction, slowing down the efficient execution of the CEO's will.

This concentration of power finds disturbing parallels in the Trump administration's actions to centralise authority and bypass democratic constraints. Directives allowing the executive branch to simply choose not to enforce existing regulations or forcing independent agencies under direct White House control reflect a clear preference for unified, top-down command over the distributed authority inherent in democratic systems (Skadden, 2025). It's a move towards a system where power is absolute and accountability to the people is non-existent.

The Great Escape: "Exit" as a Cruel Illusion for the Powerless

Neocameralism replaces the fundamental democratic right to "voice,” to speak, protest, and vote, with the market-based concept of "exit." Dislike the ruling corporation? Simply leave and find another "patch" or jurisdiction, like switching phone providers. Freedom becomes the freedom to flee, not the freedom to participate or change the system you live under.

This elevation of "exit" over "voice" is a cruel illusion for most people. As we previously observed, it "fundamentally misunderstands the nature of citizenship and community, reducing complex social bonds to mere consumer choices" (Plague Island, 2025a). Real lives are rooted in place, family, culture, and economic realities. The vast majority lack the resources or ability to simply pack up and move. For them, "exit" is not an option, leaving them trapped under a governance system they have no power to influence, their voices silenced, their needs ignored. The creation of Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) underscores this logic, prioritising machine-like efficiency over human representation and participation.

Sovereign Startups: A Fragmented World Ruled by Corporate Warlords

Land's vision of "patchwork" governance pushes this logic to its extreme, envisioning a world fractured into countless competing micro-states run like corporations. While proponents claim this creates a "market for governance" that drives innovation, the reality is a potential dystopia of corporate fiefdoms where human rights are subordinate to profit motives. Imagine essential services like healthcare, education, or security becoming luxury goods available only to those who can afford the premium "patch." This fragmentation could exacerbate inequality and undermine any sense of shared community or national identity, leaving individuals isolated and vulnerable within competing corporate territories.

The Trump administration's push towards deregulation and state autonomy, while not explicitly patchwork, creates fertile ground for such fragmentation. By weakening federal standards and encouraging states to compete in a regulatory "race to the bottom," it mirrors the competitive dynamic Neocameralism champions, potentially leading to a future where basic protections vary wildly depending on which corporate-influenced jurisdiction one happens to live in.

Democracy's Death Warrant: The Fundamental Rejection of Human Agency

Neocameralism heralds a fundamental rejection of democracy’s legitimacy and the human agency it represents. It views democratic participation, debate, and compromise not as essential features of self-governance but as inefficient noise in the system. The administrative state is seen as an illegitimate power centre, an obstacle to the CEO-ruler's absolute authority.

This deep hostility towards democratic institutions is mirrored in the Trump administration's legal challenges to the administrative state, leveraging court decisions like Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo to strip agencies of their ability to interpret and implement laws (Skadden, 2025). It's an attempt to dismantle the very mechanisms through which democratic will is translated into action, clearing the path for unchecked executive power.

As our analysis highlighted, Yarvin's rejection is fundamentally moral: "he views democratic governance as inherently illegitimate regardless of its outcomes" (Plague Island, 2025a). This isn't about fixing democracy; it's about replacing it with a system that explicitly denies the value of collective self-determination and individual political rights. It seeks to replace the citizen with the subject, the participant with the consumer, the human with the data point.

The Ultimate CEO-Ruler: Peter Thiel's Vision Beyond Trump and Vance

The rise of Neocameralism cannot be understood without examining the role of powerful Silicon Valley figures, particularly Peter Thiel. A compelling case emerges that Thiel, a billionaire tech investor and co-founder of PayPal and Palantir, is not merely a passive supporter but potentially the aspiring architect of America's CEO-ruler future. His actions suggest a long-term strategy to dismantle democracy from within, using figures like Trump and Vance as instruments in his quest for ultimate control.

Hail to the chief.

Thiel has openly admired authoritarian models, even describing his ideal as a "neo-monarchy" (Shereshevskiy, 2025,) a vision perfectly aligned with Yarvin's Neocameralist state run by an all-powerful CEO. As a highly successful tech executive, Thiel embodies the very archetype Neocameralism venerates: the decisive, efficient leader unburdened by democratic accountability. His vast wealth provides the means, and his philosophical alignment provides the motive. His political investments appear deeply strategic. Funding Yarvin, the theorist, laid the intellectual groundwork. Backing Trump, the disruptor, helped weaken democratic norms and institutions. Elevating loyalists like J.D. Vance and Blake Masters - former employees steeped in Thiel's ideology and connected to Yarvin (Pogue, 2022; Plague Island, 2025c) - places key players on the political chessboard. This looks very much like the methodical construction of a network designed to seize power.

Analyses like "Peter Thiel's plan to become CEO of America" suggest Thiel saw Trump's presidency as a vehicle, a way to exert "shadow CEO" influence (Hammond, 2016). Thiel, the venture capitalist, understands disruption. Is he ultimately applying to politics the Silicon Valley playbook of funding insurgents to break the existing system, only to eventually consolidate control himself?

Democracy at the Crossroads: Resisting the Machine-Like Logic of Corporate Autocracy

Neocameralism offers a stark vision: the state as a corporation, citizens as customers, and democracy as an obsolete inefficiency. It is a philosophy that, under the guise of order and efficiency, seeks to strip governance of its human element, replacing messy democratic processes with the cold, hierarchical logic of the machine. Its growing influence, fuelled by tech wealth and political opportunism, represents a clear and present danger to democratic societies worldwide.

As we warned in our analysis, identifying this specific anti-democratic ideology "sharpens our vigilance" against forces seeking to undermine self-governance (Plague Island, 2025a). The real-world implementation of Neocameralist principles, visible in the actions of the Trump administration, demonstrates that this is not merely abstract theory but an active political project with tangible consequences for people's lives and freedoms.

And what if the ultimate goal is even more audacious? What if Peter Thiel, the Silicon Valley kingmaker, truly envisions himself as the CEO-ruler, using figures like Trump and Vance as disposable tools in a long game to seize control? The tech industry playbook: disrupt, acquire, and consolidate applied to the governance of nations is a terrifying prospect. Are we witnessing the incubation phase of a corporate coup, orchestrated by a billionaire who sees democracy itself as the ultimate market inefficiency to be disrupted?

The allure of Neocameralism feeds on genuine public frustration with democratic shortcomings. But its proposed cure of a return to unchecked executive power wrapped in corporate branding is far worse than the disease. It offers a future devoid of agency, equality, and community, run by unaccountable elites according to the dictates of profit and control. Resisting this dehumanising vision requires not only defending democratic institutions but revitalising them, proving that governance by and for the people remains the most just, resilient, and ultimately human way to navigate the complexities of our shared world.

Notes From Plague Island is quickly becoming a full-time venture. We want to grow our output and dedicate more time to writing, but it takes support! If you enjoy our work and can help, please support us on ‘Buy Me a Coffee.’ Every coffee helps, in many ways. Thank-you - we appreciate you!

https://buymeacoffee.com/notesfromplagueisland

References

Atlantic International University (2025) 'The New Monarchy: The Neo-Totalitarian Proposals of Curtis Yarvin', Atlantic International University Blog, 31 January. Available at: https://www.aiu.edu/blog/the-new-monarchy-the-neo-totalitarian-proposals-of-curtis-yarvin/ [Accessed 7 April 2025.]

Brookings Institution (2022) 'Examining some of Trump’s deregulation efforts: Lessons from the Brookings Regulatory Tracker', Brookings, 8 March. Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/examining-some-of-trumps-deregulation-efforts-lessons-from-the-brookings-regulatory-tracker/ [Accessed 12 April 2025.]

Forbes (2021) 'Status Report: What Regulations Did The Trump Administration Eliminate In 2020?', Forbes, 19 January. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/waynecrews/2021/01/19/status-report-what-regulations-did-the-trump-administration-eliminate-in-2020/ [Accessed 12 April 2025.]

Hammond, S. (2016) 'Peter Thiel’s plan to become CEO of America', Medium, Niskanen Center. Available at: https://medium.com/niskanen-center/peter-thiels-plan-to-become-ceo-of-america-454d5095f139 [Accessed 15 April 2025.]

Michael, G. (2022) 'An antidemocratic philosophy called ‘neoreaction’ is creeping into GOP politics', The Conversation, 27 July. Available at: https://theconversation.com/an-antidemocratic-philosophy-called-neoreaction-is-creeping-into-gop-politics-182581 [Accessed 7 April 2025.]

Plague Island (2025a) The Dark Enlightenment Lens: Understanding the Slow Strangulation of Democracy.’ Plague Island, 28 March. Available at: https://www.plagueisland.com/p/the-dark-enlightenment-lens-understanding [Accessed 30 April 2025.]

Plague Island (2025b) 'Accelerating Toward Autocracy: Nick Land’s Vision and Its Implementation.’ Plague Island, 16 April. Available at: https://www.plagueisland.com/p/part-5-accelerating-toward-autocracy [Accessed 30 April 2025.]

Plague Island (2025c) ‘Silicon Valley’s Unholy Alliance: How Tech Wealth Powers the New Religious Right.’ Plague Island, 4 April. Available at: https://www.plagueisland.com/p/silicon-valleys-unholy-alliance-how [Accessed 30 April 2025.]

Plague Island (2025d) ‘The Shadow of Christian Nationalism: J.D. Vance, the Vice Presidency and the Threat to Pluralism.’ Plague Island, 1 April. Available at: https://www.plagueisland.com/p/the-shadow-of-christian-nationalism[Accessed 30 April 2025.]

Plague Island (2025e) ‘From Heidegger to Here: The Philosophical Roots of America’s Alt-Right.’ Plague Island, 7 April. Available at: https://www.plagueisland.com/p/from-heidegger-to-here-the-philosophical [Accessed 30 April 2025.]

Pogue, J. (2022) 'Inside the New Right, Where Peter Thiel Is Placing His Biggest Bets', Vanity Fair, April. Available at: https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/04/inside-the-new-right-where-peter-thiel-is-placing-his-biggest-bets [Accessed: 15 April 2025.]

Shereshevskiy, M. (2025) 'The rise of “neo-monarchy”: Trump’s plan to transform US political landscape', Caliber.az, 24 February. Available at: https://caliber.az/en/post/the-rise-of-neo-monarchy-trump-s-plan-to-transform-us-political-landscape [Accessed: 15 April 2025.]

Skadden (2025) 'Rolling Back the Administrative State: Understanding Trump’s Deregulatory Initiative', Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, 25 February. Available at: https://www.skadden.com/insights/publications/2025/02/rolling-back-the-administrative-state [Accessed: 12 April 2025.]

White House (2025a) 'Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Reins in Government Overreach and Begins Deconstruction of Unconstitutional Administrative State', The White House, 19 February. Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/02/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-reins-in-government-overreach-and-begins-deconstruction-of-unconstitutional-administrative-state/ [Accessed: 12 April 2025.]

White House (2025b) 'Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Launches Massive 10-to-1 Deregulation Initiative', The White House, 31 January. Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/01/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-launches-massive-10-to-1-deregulation-initiative/ [Accessed: 12 April 2025.]

Yarvin, C. (2007-2013) 'Unqualified Reservations', Unqualified Reservations. Available at:

https://www.unqualified-reservations.org/

[Accessed: 7 April 2025.]

19keys (2025) 'Neocameralism is a political philosophy proposed by Curtis Yarvin', X, 4 April. Available at: https://x.com/19keys_/status/1908278424566890519 [Accessed: 7 April 2025.]