Dancing to Reform's Tune: Starmer's Immigration U-Turn and the Politics of Fear
In an era where political principles have become as disposable as campaign promises, a new and disturbing pattern has emerged in British politics: the mainstreaming of xenophobia as electoral strategy. We are witnessing not just the normalisation of far-right rhetoric, but its adoption by those who once claimed to stand against it. This is a fundamental transformation of our political landscape, one where the boundaries between mainstream and extremist positions have collapsed, and where power is pursued not as a means to implement vision, but as an end in itself.
At the centre of this transformation stands Keir Starmer, a figure whose political journey reads like a case study in the corrosive effects of ambition without conviction. Once a human rights lawyer who defended the marginalised, he has metamorphosed into something unrecognisable: a politician willing to sacrifice the very principles that defined his earlier career on the altar of electoral expediency. His evolution is emblematic of a broader crisis in progressive politics: one where the left finds itself not just abandoned but actively betrayed by those who claimed to be its champions.
The immigration white paper unveiled by Starmer's government in May 2025 represents the culmination of this betrayal. Standing before the nation with practiced gravity, he declared that the Labour government was bringing the system "back into control" (Francis, 2025). Net migration would fall "significantly." The UK must not become an "island of strangers" (Sparrow, 2025). The language was stark, the proposed measures draconian, and the political calculation transparent. This was a performance; a carefully choreographed display designed to signal to right-leaning voters that Labour had shed its progressive identity.
But to understand the true significance of this moment, we must look beyond the immediate policy announcements to the deeper currents reshaping British politics. We are living through an age where political identity is increasingly defined not by what one stands for, but by what one stands against. The rise of Reform UK, with its simplistic narratives and apocalyptic warnings about immigration, has created a gravitational pull that is distorting the entire political spectrum. Rather than countering this force with a compelling alternative vision, Starmer has chosen to surrender to it. He has chosen to become its respectable face, its establishment avatar.
This capitulation did not begin with the immigration white paper. It has been unfolding since Starmer first secured the Labour leadership, promising unity while systematically dismantling every progressive policy that helped him win. What we are witnessing is not a sudden pivot but the revelation of a long-term strategy: the deliberate remaking of Labour as a party hostile to its left wing, a party willing to adopt Conservative and even Reform UK positions in pursuit of power. The immigration policies are merely the most visible manifestation of this deeper transformation.
The cynicism of this approach is breathtaking. Starmer is betting that progressive voters have nowhere else to go, that they will hold their noses and vote Labour regardless of how far right he moves, simply to keep Reform and the Conservatives out. This is not triangulation; it is hostage-taking. He is deliberately alienating his base while chasing voters who may never be satisfied with his rightward shift, no matter how extreme it becomes. It is a strategy that treats principles as obstacles and consistency as weakness, a strategy built on the assumption that power, once secured, justifies any means used to obtain it.
In this article, we examine the anatomy of Starmer's betrayal, from his pre-election courtship of disillusioned Tory voters to his post-election acceleration toward Reform UK territory. We will analyse the specific immigration policies proposed, their human and economic costs, and the fundamental contradictions they reveal in Starmer's political project. Most importantly, we will explore why this strategy - beyond its moral bankruptcy - is likely to fail on its own terms. We will explain why the attempt to out-Reform Reform represents a profound strategic miscalculation.
We begin by tracing Starmer's long war on the left, a campaign that reveals not just political opportunism but active hostility toward the very principles he once claimed to embody.
The Calculated Betrayal: Starmer's Long War on the Left
Make no mistake: Keir Starmer is not ignoring the left. He is actively hostile to it. His rightward trajectory began well before the 2024 election victory, with his initial focus on appealing to disillusioned Tory voters and centrists put off by Corbyn. From the moment he secured the Labour leadership on a platform of unity and continuity with key Corbyn-era policies, he has methodically dismantled every progressive promise that helped him win. Starmer’s latest position on immigration aligns perfectly with Conservative ideology, revealing how far Starmer has traveled from Labour's values.
The spectre of Reform UK, particularly its success among older voters in local elections, has become Starmer's convenient excuse for accelerating this rightward lurch. But this is no reactive pivot; it is the revelation of his true political project. Nigel Farage, Reform's figurehead, dismissed Labour's proposals as mere "tinkering around the edges," a panicked response to his party's ascendancy (Francis, 2025). Yet even this criticism misses the deeper cynicism at work. Starmer isn't panicking, he's opportunistically exploiting the political moment to advance an agenda that betrays Labour's core values while assuming its traditional voters have nowhere else to go.
The underlying calculation is as cynical as it is transparent: those on the left will ultimately have no choice but to vote Labour to keep Reform and the Conservatives out. This frees Starmer to chase right-leaning votes with policies and rhetoric that actively demonise the very principles the Labour movement was built upon. He’s betting that the left will remain captive to a party that now openly despises them.
This contempt for the left extends beyond immigration. Starmer's recent musings about reinstating the winter fuel allowance reveal the same calculating cynicism. This is the same allowance his government stripped from millions of vulnerable older people, justifying the cut with claims the country simply could not afford it. Now, with those same older voters appearing politically sensitive and potentially drifting toward Reform, the narrative conveniently shifts. The money that couldn't be found for pensioners freezing in their homes suddenly materialises when electoral advantage demands it. Such a sequence - removal due to claimed unaffordability, followed by hints of return driven by naked electoral expediency - isn't just cynical; it's cruel. It reveals a leadership for whom principles are disposable and suffering is acceptable when politically convenient.
Power at Any Price: The Starmer Doctrine
What has become increasingly clear is that Starmer will do whatever it takes to win, to cling onto power. This is not a leader guided by principle or vision, but by the raw pursuit of electoral advantage. His pre-election courtship of disillusioned Tory voters and centrists was not a temporary tactical manoeuvre but the beginning of a fundamental realignment. The recent local election losses and Reform's surge have merely accelerated a trajectory that was already well underway.
This power-at-any-cost approach explains the bewildering contradictions in Starmer's governance. The human rights lawyer who now flirts with rhetoric that undermines human rights. The unity candidate who has purged the left from his party. The leader who promised to honour his ten pledges, then systematically abandoned or eroded each one. These are not the actions of a politician adapting to changing circumstances; they are the calculated moves of a man for whom power is not a means to an end, but the end itself.
The Right-Wing Blueprint: Dismantling Immigration Rights Piece by Piece
At the heart of Starmer's new strategy lies an extensive immigration white paper, a document that reads like a Reform UK wishlist with a Labour letterhead (Sparrow, 2025). The proposals for skilled worker visas represent a direct assault on the UK's economic future: the qualification threshold raised back to RQF Level 6 (degree level), salary thresholds increased, the existing immigration salary list abolished, and access to the points-based system restricted to occupations facing demonstrable long-term shortages. This is performative cruelty designed to appease the right-wing press and Reform-curious voters.
The changes mark a significant departure from the Boris Johnson era, which had seen the skilled worker threshold lowered to A-level equivalent. Starmer now seeks to reverse this, rendering an estimated 180 job roles ineligible for this visa route (Francis, 2025). The message is clear: Labour is willing to damage the economy to appear tough on immigration. The fact that businesses will suffer, skills gaps will widen, and growth will stall is apparently irrelevant to the greater goal of winning Reform's voters.
The social care sector, already in crisis, faces perhaps the most devastating blow: a ban on new overseas recruitment for social care visas. While existing workers can apply for extensions during a transition period until 2028, the move was rightly decried by Care England as a "crushing blow" and "cruel," threatening to collapse an already fragile system (Sparrow, 2025; Francis, 2025). The Home Office itself estimates this change will cut worker intake by 7,000 to 8,000 a year, a figure that deliberately downplays the sector's profound reliance on international staff (Francis, 2025). Starmer knows this will hurt the most vulnerable - the elderly, the disabled, those needing round-the-clock care - but has calculated that their suffering is an acceptable price for appearing tough on immigration.
International students and academic institutions, one of Britain's few remaining world-class sectors, are also in Starmer's crosshairs. The post-study work visa will be reduced from 24 to 18 months. Sponsoring institutions face strengthened compliance requirements and punitive interventions. Most tellingly, the government announced a new tax on university income from international student fees (Sparrow, 2025; Francis, 2025). Universities UK and the National Centre for Universities and Business immediately warned these measures would devastate university finances and destroy the UK's global educational standing (Sparrow, 2025). Starmer's response? Silence. The destruction of Britain's higher education sector is, apparently, another acceptable casualty in his war to win Reform voters.
Even the path to settlement and citizenship, the route by which immigrants become fully integrated members of society, is being deliberately obstructed. The standard qualifying period for settlement will double from five to ten years, though a fast-track system was cynically mooted for "high-skilled, high-contributing" individuals. The government also plans to expand the points-based system to cover settlement and citizenship rules, emphasizing an individual's "contribution to the UK" (Sparrow, 2025; Francis, 2025).
Other proposals include tightening family visa rules, with legislation planned to assert government supremacy over Article 8 ECHR (right to family life) arguments in deportation cases - a direct attack on human rights protections. English language requirements will increase across immigration routes. Employers face a 32% hike in the Immigration Skills Charge, pushing costs for sponsoring a worker up to £2,400 for smaller firms and £6,600 for larger ones (Francis, 2025).
The Politics of Betrayal: Starmer's Rightward Lurch
This represents, by any measure, not just a hardening of Labour's stance but a fundamental betrayal of its values. Starmer himself has adopted the language of the right, accusing British industries of an "addiction to importing cheap labour," a phrase that could have been lifted directly from a Reform UK manifesto (Francis, 2025). He speaks of immigration being "selective," of Britain "deciding who comes to this country,” dog whistles that have long signalled hostility to migrants.
The echoes of Enoch Powell in Starmer's "island of strangers" comment, though weakly defended by ministers like Seema Malhotra as a misinterpretation (Sparrow, 2025), were immediately recognised by critics on the left. Labour MPs Nadia Whittome and Zarah Sultana condemned the rhetoric as a dangerous flirtation with far-right scaremongering, arguing it was shameful and would inflame anti-migrant sentiment (Sparrow, 2025; Francis, 2025). But their concerns were dismissed. What remains of the left wing of the Labour Party is treated as an embarrassing relic, an obstacle to his rightward march.
The Doomed Strategy: Why Starmer Cannot Win This Battle
Starmer's wager - that he can outflank Reform on immigration – is strategically doomed. The attempt to outmanoeuvre a populist right-wing party on its signature issue has failed repeatedly across democracies. By adopting increasingly extreme rhetoric and policies, mainstream parties don't neutralise the far right. They legitimise it. They enter a bidding war where the populist right will always go further, always promise more draconian measures, always paint a more alarming picture.
Reform UK, unburdened by the complexities of governance, can always escalate. Farage's dismissal of Labour's plan as insufficient, even if numbers did fall, because they would still be at "massive historic highs," demonstrates this perfectly (Francis, 2025). The goalposts for what constitutes "control" or "significant reduction" will constantly shift, defined by those who benefit most from perpetual crisis. Starmer is playing a game he cannot win, on a field designed for his defeat.
Moreover, his approach actively alienates Labour's traditional base and those advocating for a humane approach to migration. The criticisms from within his own party, from refugee charities like Care4Calais (Sparrow, 2025), and from sectors reliant on migrant labour, highlight the internal contradictions and potential electoral damage. The SNP government in Scotland warned of a "devastating" impact on its care sector (Sparrow, 2025). But Starmer doesn't care because he has calculated that progressive voters have nowhere else to go.
The Conservative response, with Kemi Badenoch stating the plans were "nowhere near the scale of the change we need" and reiterating the Tory desire for a binding migration cap, further illustrates the trap Starmer has set for himself (Francis, 2025). He is fighting on two fronts: against a resurgent populist right and a Conservative opposition eager to paint Labour as either too extreme or not extreme enough. It's a battle he cannot win because the terms of engagement are defined by his opponents.
The fundamental challenge for Starmer is that immigration is not an issue that can be "solved" by policy tweaks aimed at placating the loudest voices. It is deeply intertwined with economic structures, demographic trends, global interconnectedness, and public perception. Attempting to beat the populist right at its own game means accepting their framing of the issue: as primarily a problem of numbers and control, rather than one of managing a complex reality with benefits and challenges. The thinktank British Future pointed out that public opinion is more nuanced than often portrayed, with many people acting as "balancers" on immigration, not seeking to drive down numbers at all costs (Sparrow, 2025). But nuance doesn't win headlines or neutralise Reform.
The Verdict of History: Starmer's Legacy of Betrayal
As we look beyond the immediate political calculations to the longer arc of history, the verdict on Starmer's immigration strategy becomes even clearer. This is not just a tactical error or a momentary capitulation to political pressure. It is a fundamental betrayal of everything Labour once stood for, a betrayal that will echo through generations.
The Labour movement was built on solidarity, on the recognition that working people of all backgrounds share common interests and face common struggles. It was founded on the principle that human dignity transcends national boundaries, that justice cannot be confined by borders or citizenship status. In embracing the politics of division and scapegoating, Starmer has not simply abandoned these principles, he has actively undermined them.
The human cost of this betrayal is immeasurable. Behind every visa restriction, every salary threshold increase, every extension of the settlement period are real lives: families separated, dreams deferred, potential squandered. The social care worker from the Philippines who can no longer come to Britain, leaving vulnerable elderly people without support. The international student whose shortened post-study work visa forces them to leave just as they begin contributing to British society. The refugee whose family reunification is blocked by new restrictions. These are human tragedies multiplied thousands of times over.
And for what? For a strategy that history tells us will fail. The lesson from across Europe is clear: mainstream parties cannot defeat the far right by adopting its rhetoric and policies. They can only legitimise and normalise extremism, dragging the entire political spectrum rightward while, failing to address the underlying issues driving discontent. From France to Italy, from Germany to Sweden, this pattern has played out repeatedly, with devastating consequences for progressive politics and vulnerable communities alike.
Starmer stands at a crossroads. He can continue down this path of cynical capitulation, sacrificing principle for power and ultimately achieving neither. Or he can recognise the profound error of his approach and chart a different course, one that offers a genuine alternative to the politics of fear and division, one that speaks to people's better instincts rather than their worst, one that addresses the real economic and social challenges facing Britain without scapegoating the vulnerable.
The choice he makes will define not just his legacy but the future of the Labour Party and progressive politics in Britain. If he continues on his current trajectory, he risks transforming Labour into nothing more than a pale imitation of its opponents, a party without a soul, without a purpose beyond the pursuit of power for its own sake. The left will not forget this betrayal, nor will history forgive it.
For those who still believe in a politics of solidarity, compassion, and genuine economic justice, the message is clear: Starmer's immigration strategy is a fundamental betrayal of everything Labour should stand for. It must be opposed, not just for the sake of migrants and refugees, but for the soul of progressive politics itself. The battle to reclaim Labour from this rightward drift, to reassert its founding values and vision, is an existential necessity.
In the final analysis, Starmer's attempt to dance to Reform's tune reveals not political cunning but profound moral cowardice. It is the strategy of a leader who has lost faith in his own ability to persuade, to inspire, to lead. And in that loss of faith lies the seeds of his inevitable failure. A Labour Party that stands for nothing except power, deserves neither power nor respect. And it certainly does not deserve the votes of those who still believe that politics should be about more than winning at any cost.
Notes From Plague Island is quickly becoming a full-time venture. We want to grow our output and dedicate more time to writing, but it takes support! If you enjoy our work and can help, please support us on ‘Buy Me a Coffee.’ Every coffee helps, in many ways. Thank-you - we appreciate you!
https://buymeacoffee.com/notesfromplagueisland
References
Francis, S. (2025) ‘Immigration to drop 'significantly' under visa changes, says PM.’ BBC News, 12 May. Available at: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c9wgrv7pwrzo [Accessed: 12 May 2025.]
Gross, A., Parker, G. and The Financial Times. (2025). ‘Keir Starmer unveils migration curbs.The Financial Times, 12 May. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/55bcac8b-6430-4040-b005-6cc24325dc71 [Accessed: 12 May 2025. Note: Article behind paywall, full content not accessed.]
Sparrow, A. (2025). ‘Labour MP says Starmer's 'island of strangers' warning over immigration mimics scaremongering of far right – UK politics live.’ The Guardian, 12 May. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/live/2025/may/12/immigration-keir-starmer-labour-reform-visa-foreign-workers-uk-politics-latest-live-news [Accessed: 12 May 2025.]